![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | Enhancement of Happiness under the Vision of Common Prosperity: The Perspective of Dual Justice Theory |
摘要: | 共同富裕无悖于微观正义,才能激发效率,使个体获得符合微观正义原则的应得预期进而提升幸福感;共同富裕体现宏观正义,才能保障普惠福祉,在宏观层次上降低生活不确定性感知进而提升幸福感。本研究通过分析CGSS2010资料发现,微观公平感与微观正义原则认知显著相关,但与最小化收入差距规则认知无关;宏观公平感与最小化收入差距规则认知显著相关,却与微观正义原则认知无关。宏观公平感和微观公平感均与平均主义原则认知负相关,二者能独立提升幸福感且效应可加。 |
英文摘要: | Common prosperity is not contrary to micro justice,which can stimulate efficiency and enhance happiness by enabling individuals to obtain deserved expectations in accordance with micro justice principles. Common prosperity embodies macro-justice,which can guarantee universal well-being and enhance happiness by reducing the perception of life uncertainty at the macro level. Analyzing the CGSS2010 data,it is found that perception of micro-fairness is significantly related to the cognition of micro-justice principle but not to the cognition of minimizing income disparity rule; perception of macro-fairness is significantly related to the cognition of minimizing income disparity rule but not to the cognition of micro-justice principle. Both perception of macro-fairness and micro-fairness were negatively related to the cognition of egalitarian principle,and both of them could independently enhance happiness with additive effects. |
作者: | 刘欣、胡安宁 |
作者单位: | 复旦大学社会学系 |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2023.1: |
中图分类号: | |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | 共同富裕;宏观与微观公平感;宏观与微观正义原则;幸福感 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | 本文为刘欣主持的中宣部文化名家暨“四个一批”人才自主选题项目“中国转型社会的社会分层与流动”的阶段性研究成果。 |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第4186位读者! |