![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | Knowledge Making and Performing in Environmental Governance: An Arena Analysis of Waste Incineration Technological Disputes |
摘要: | 本研究从科学技术研究(STS)的进路出发,打开技术的“黑箱”,检视反对垃圾焚烧运动当中的技术争议。基于论域分析的框架,本文对垃圾焚烧技术的争议焦点——剧毒物质二噁英的排放进行分析,以回答这项技术招致反对的原因。本文还将借由民族志带领读者进入两个社会世界——垃圾焚烧设施及其应用者的话语世界和反焚运动的话语世界,并在此基础上剖析垃圾焚烧的知识是如何在不同的社会世界中由不同的社会行动者生产、应用、循环和竞争的。在科技知识生产的意义上,本研究为环境运动研究提供了新的进路,也为后续的环境治理、环境运动以及技术争议研究提供了一个可用的方法包。 |
英文摘要: | This study takes an approach of Science and Technology Studies (STS),and opens the black box of a particular technology to examine the technological controversies of anti-incineration movements. Based on the arena analysis framework,it analyzes the technical controversies of waste incineration,which is the release of the highly toxic substance named dioxins,and answers why this technology triggers controversies. Furthermore,ethnography leads readers into two society worlds:the world of garbage incineration facilities and their supporters,and the world of the anti-waste incineration activism Subsequently,it shows how knowledge about waste incineration is produced,applied,recycled,and competed by different social actors in different social worlds. From the perspective of scientific knowledge production,this research provides a new approach for environmental movement research. Moreover, this study provides a useful method package for subsequent environmental governance,environmental campaigns and research on technological disputes. |
作者: | 张劼颖、李雪石 |
作者单位: | 中国社会科学院社会学研究所(张劼颖);香港中文大学(深圳)人文与社科学院(李雪石) |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2019.4:146-169 |
中图分类号: | |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | STS;论域分析;环境治理;知识生产 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第3463位读者! |