![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | Between Positivism and Pragmatism: A Review of Two Western Social Work Practice Models and Their Epistemological Foundations |
摘要: | 本文对证据为本的实践模式和行动反思的实践模式两种社会工作实践模式背后的认识论进行了系统讨论,分析其与社会工作专业教育的关系。建基于实证主义之上的证据为本的实践模式大大提升了专业实践的效能与信心,然而,证据为本的实践模式窄化了专业实践的范围,导向一种个体行为主义的专业实践观和效能论。实用主义的行动反思实践模式试图把普遍的实证知识与具体的实践情景相结合,开展现场框架实验。这有助于形成专业实践能力的微观整合基础。这两种实践模式及其认识论基础有助于促进中国社会工作专业的发展,但也存在短板,对于介入中国社会转型缺乏思路。 |
英文摘要: | The evidence-based practice model based on positivism, has greatly enhanced the efficacy and confidence of professional practice, but it has narrowed the scope of professional practice and led to an individual behaviorist view of professional practice and efficacy theory. The pragmatic action-reflection model attempts to combine universal empirical knowledge with specific practice situations and conduct frame experiment on the spot. This contributes to a micro-integrated foundation of professional practice competence. This paper systematically discusses the epistemology behind two models of social work practice, the evidence-based practice model and the action-reflective practice model, and analyzes their relationship to social work professional education. The paper argues that these two practice models and their epistemological foundations help to promote the development of the social work profession in China on the one hand, but also suffer from the shortcoming of lacking an interventionist approach to the transformation of Chinese society on the other. |
作者: | 郭伟和 |
作者单位: | 中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院 |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2022.3: |
中图分类号: | |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | 证据为本模式;行动反思模式;实证主义;实用主义 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | 本研究得到中央民族大学科研创新团队项目与“一流”专业和课程建设项目的支持。 |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第3213位读者! |