![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | Classical Social Theories and Comparative Historical Analysis—A Critical Appraisal |
摘要: | 比较历史分析是20世纪60年代中期在美国社会科学界开始兴盛的一个跨学科研究范式,其渊源可以追溯到20世纪20年代以前的欧洲经典社会科学传统。本文从知识社会学的视角梳理了比较历史分析的欧洲经典传统的奠基、在美国学界发生的“扳道”以及复兴的过程,剖析了以摩尔和斯考切波为代表的美国比较历史分析主流学界对马克思、韦伯等经典传统的理解方式,批评了美国学界过度化约经典理论的复杂性带来的“中层理论化”问题,并面向中国学界提出了比较历史分析再造的新起点。 |
英文摘要: | Comparative historical analysis is an interdisciplinary theoretical paradigm flourished in American social sciences in the mid-1960s, but its true origins can be traced back to the European classic social science tradition before the 1920s. This article takes the perspective of the sociology of knowledge to explicate the embeddedness of the European classic tradition of comparative historical analysis, the “switch” and its revival in the American academia, and analyzes how the mainstream school of comparative historical analysis in the United States (represented by Barrington Moore and Theda Skocpol) understands classic works from Marx and Weber. This article criticizes the middle-level theorization for reducing the complexity of classics, and proposes a new starting point for comparative historical analysis for the Chinese academia. |
作者: | 应星 |
作者单位: | 清华大学社会学系 |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2021.2: |
中图分类号: | |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | 比较历史分析;经典;中层理论化;摩尔—斯考切波路线 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第4558位读者! |