![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | Dialectic Relations between Positivist Knowledge and Practical Logic within Social Work Professional Practice: On the Contextual Practice of Evidence-based Correction |
摘要: | 证据为本的实践模式主张社会工作专业应该基于实证研究范式下的实验研究结论,采取有效的干预策略为案主提供服务。然而,日常生活的实践过程,包括专业实践过程,是在特定社会场域中被结构性关系所形塑,又被特定场域下的符号体系所掩盖的惯性化的即兴发挥过程。它有自己的实践逻辑,不受实验过程的控制,很难将实证科学知识直接应用其中。本文通过一个社区矫正案例展示社会工作专业如何把犯罪学研究指明的再犯风险的发生面向和风险要素等实证知识与当事人的生活习性和生活轨迹结合起来,跟随当事人日常生活中不断涌现的压力事件,协助其对自己的行为习性进行反省和自觉,重新选择新的应对模式,逐步改变生活模式,降低再犯风险。 |
英文摘要: | Evidence-based practice model argues that the social work profession should be based on results of positivist research, and adopt valid strategies to provide service to clients. However, practice in everyday life, including professional practice, is a process of urgent improvisation triggered by the subjects’ habitus, which is shaped by the structure of the social field and masked by the symbolic system. Our case of community correction demonstrates that social work profession can integrate positivist knowledge of criminal psychology with the habitus of clients and their life trajectory, follow the contingent life events to help client reflect on his/her habitual coping strategy, re-choose new coping strategy, change the life model gradually and reduce recidivism. |
作者: | 郭伟和 |
作者单位: | 中央民族大学民族学与社会学学院 |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2019.5:116-137 |
中图分类号: | |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | 实证知识;实践逻辑;生活事件;反思性;社区矫正 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | 本文写作得到了中央民族大学科研创新团队计划以及中央民族大学“一流专业”项目(XJYLZY191374)和“一流课程”项目(YLKCZY191393)的支持。 |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第2520位读者! |