![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | The Dual Inflation of Course Grade and Student Evaluation of Teaching: Evidence from a University in China |
摘要: | 在经历了“重科研轻教学”的发展阶段后,近年来很多国家都开始关注高等教育人才培养的质量。在回归大学“立德树人”之根本的同时,也要警惕简单机械地使用学生评教这一工具的弊端。本文使用国内某大学2010-2016学年度的课程成绩和评教分数数据,利用该大学在2015年春季学期对课程成绩优秀率放松控制这一自然实验,探究学生成绩与评教分数之间的因果关系。研究发现,优秀率的放松带来了课程成绩和评教分数的双重膨胀,而且对于实验组中那些确实发生了分数膨胀的课程,学生在评教分数上给予了更加慷慨的回馈,课程分数每提高1分,学生评教分数显著提高2分。因此我们有理由相信,学生和老师之间围绕学生评教分数和课程分数产生了合作或者说“共谋”。 |
英文摘要: | Theoretical research has shown that overemphasizing student evaluation of teaching could lead to grade inflation. Exploiting an exogenous policy change on grade ceiling in a research university in China and using data between 2010 and 2016, we find that the relaxation of grade ceiling has led to both an increase in the course grades faculties gave to students and a rise in student evaluation of teaching at 1 and 0.5 points respectively. Estimates from instrumental variable approach show that students reciprocated grade inflation by inflating their evaluation of the faculties’ teaching. This suggests that the students and faculties may be engaged in collusion in the intricate relationship between teaching and learning. |
作者: | 哈巍、赵颖 |
作者单位: | 北京大学教育学院、教育经济研究所(哈巍);北京大学政策法规研究室、社会学系(赵颖) |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2019.1:84-105 |
中图分类号: | |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | 学生评教;分数膨胀;场域理论;委托代理模型;工具变量法 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | 感谢教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“博弈论视角下新型师生关系:学生成绩和评教分数双重膨胀研究”(编号18YJC880142)和“学生评教的影响因素研究及其与分数膨胀的博弈关系分析”课题(编号2016YB09)的资金支持。 |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第5068位读者! |