![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | Do Deep Pockets Have More Political Influence?—— The Size of Private Enterprises and Their Strategy Selection in Resolving Administrative Disputes |
摘要: | 针对“中国私营企业调查”(CPES2006)资料的多元统计分析显示,在处理与政府的行政纠纷时,相比于中低经济资本的私营企业,高经济资本的企业更可能利用行政渠道与政府直接沟通,占据政治优势。相比于高或低经济资本的企业,中等经济资本的企业更可能通过行会、商会等自组织或非正式途径来解决行政纠纷。但经济资本对于私营企业是否选择抗争性行动策略没有显著影响,具有党员身份的私营企业主更可能抗争。同时,策略选择模式还存在着区域间差异。本文揭示了当代中国政商关系基于企业经济资本差异而产生的分化,在一定程度上修正了庇护主义的主导理解范式。这也表明,在转型期的中国不仅不存在一个“资产阶级”,而且在给定的政体条件下,经济权力转化为政治权力的路径受到私营经济自身特征的影响。 |
英文摘要: | Based on statistical analyses of data from the China Private Enterprise Survey (2006), this article reveals the function of the economic capital of the private enterprise on the differentiated government-business relationship. When resolving disputes with the government, private enterprises with more economic capital are more likely to directly contact the government agency, displaying greater political privileges. Private enterprises with middle-range economic capital, on the other hand, show higher preference to take advantage of business associations or particularistic relationships. However, instead of economic capital, it is the Communist Party membership of private entrepreneurs that influences their confrontational strategies. There is also regional variation on the selection of strategies. This article casts doubt on the possibility of the class formation of capitalists in China. Under the specific context of the Chinese society, the path from economic power to political power in China is shaped by the emerging characteristics of the economic sector. |
作者: | 纪莺莺、范晓光 |
作者单位: | 上海大学社会学院(纪莺莺);浙江大学社会学系、地方政府与社会治理研究中心(范晓光) |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2017.3:193-215 |
中图分类号: | |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | 经济资本;庇护主义;政商关系;议价能力 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | 本文是上海市社科规划委托课题“当代中国转型理论与实践的国际比较”(批准号2016WZX017)的阶段性成果。 |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第3755位读者! |