![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | Taking Environmental Sociology to Action: From the Perspective of Reflexive Sociology |
摘要: | 本文以反思社会学为视角,从“环境社会学为何”与“环境社会学何为”两个维度,重新检视环境社会学的价值关怀、学科品格、研究伦理和方法论取向。分析发现,环境社会学是一门以环境正义为价值关怀、以实践性为基本品格的社会学分支学科,而本体论和认识论中主客二分的前提预设却从根本上阻档、抑制着环境正义和实践品格的彰显,学科的内部合法性和外部合法性危机由此产生。因此,重构环境社会学的内部合法性和外部合法性的根本之路在于,从本体论和认识论的双重维度探寻能够在经验层面实现学科旨趣、体现学科关怀、彰显学科品格的研究方法或路径。以正义和进步为价值基础,以互为主体性为前提预设的行动研究,为超越环境社会学的合法性危机提供了一种现实可能。 |
英文摘要: | From the perspective of reflexive sociology, this paper explores the values, disciplinary characteristics, research ethics and methodological orientation of environmental sociology. The discussion is organized by the questions of “what environmental sociology is” and “environmental sociology for what”. As a branch of sociology, environmental sociology takes environmental justice as its value, and practicality as its fundamental character. However, the manifestation of environmental justice and practicality is hampered by the premise of subject-object dichotomy in ontology and epistemology. The internal and external legitimacy crisis of environmental sociology ensues. Therefore, the way to reconstruct the internal and external legitimacy of environmental sociology is to seek for research methods that can achieve the goals, express the concern and manifest the characteristics of environmental sociology at the level of practice. Action research, founded on principles of justice and progress, and premised on inter-subjectivity, makes it possible to overcome the legitimacy crisis. |
作者: | 陈占江 |
作者单位: | 浙江师范大学法政学院 |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2017.3:1-22 |
中图分类号: | |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | 环境社会学;反思社会学;合法性;行动研究 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | 本文系教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目“环境健康风险的公众认知及其形塑机制研究”(13YJC840004)的阶段性成果。 |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第3845位读者! |