![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | |
摘要: | 无 |
英文摘要: | In the qualitative research ,Dr .Chen Xiangming offers tw o analysis types : “emic” and “etic” .“Emic” is particularly preferable.But through literature survey we find that the boundary of “emic” is neg lected .In this article we investigate the applicatio n of “emic” in Chen' s tw o papers .According to those case studies, w e find if the boundary of “emic” is exceeded , normally the result will be “unmanageable and unrealistic” (it will threaten both interpretive and theo retical validity).As a special case , when the research requires exceeding the boundary of “emic” such as in the intercultural study , it w ill be accepted .But it is forbidden that researcher' s question is directly given to interview er.At last we summary a proposition . |
作者: | 侯龙龙; |
作者单位: | 北京理工大学高等教育研究所98级 硕士研究生; |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2001.1:108-115 |
中图分类号: | |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第1717位读者! |