“Nets of the Power-Rights Structure” and Dilemma of Peasants' Group-rights Expression :An analysis of a gravel pit dispute

本文以华中地区A镇一起石场纠纷为案例,分析农民群体性利益表达的困境,讨论了目前学界关于农民维权"以法抗争"等理解模式所存在的简单政治化倾向,指出非政治化仍然是农民维权的基本特征。论文还认为,以"合法性困境"为基点所推导出来的农民维权的弱组织和非政治化观点虽然足以批判有关农民维权行为的激情化想象,但却有忽略转型期中国政治之复杂性和过渡性特点之嫌,其对农民维权特征的基本判断虽然表面上与激情化想象不同,但两者在思维逻辑上却存在着某种内在一致性与贯通性,本身也不自觉地陷入了"民主—极权"这一泛政治化思维陷阱,将复杂的问题简单化。在此基础上,本文提出:农民利益表达之难以健康和体制化成长的原因,从场域而非结构的角度看,更直接导因于乡村社会中各种既存"权力—利益的结构之网"的阻隔,与"合法性困境"相比较,这一结构之网已经越来越成为影响和塑造具体场域中农民维权行为的更加常态和优先的因素。

Based on a case study of a gravel pit dispute , this article tries to analyze the expression dilemma of peasants' group-rights.The analysis shows the basic feature of right-protection as non-political and challenges the over-simplified politicalizing tendency existing in the stereo-typed academic understanding of “opposing by laws” in peasants' right-protection .The author also argues that the criticism mainly based on the “ legitimacy dilemma” can be quite efficient in refuting the romanticization of the peasants' right protection, but ignores the complicacy and transitional features in Chinese current transformation period, inevitably trapping itself into the “ democracy-totalitarianism” panpolitical pit and simplifying the complex issues .Seeing from the angle of field rather than that of structure , the author argues that the peasants' group-rights expression can not grow into a healthy system results more from the existing “nets of power-right structure” in the country society , where nets have become a more influential and prior element in shaping the action modes of peasants' right-protection .

吴毅；

“高等学校全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金”资助项目“改革开放以来农村社会的发展、特性与治理研究”(项目批准号:200407)的阶段性成果

欢迎阅读《社会学研究》！您是该文第2776位读者！