![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | Structuralist and Empiricist Institutional Research and Their Transition: A review of the theories of industrial relations in Europe and America |
摘要: | 作为一个独立的研究领域,欧美劳动关系研究自20世纪20年代以来,形成了两种研究传统,即制度经济学的制度与规则研究、历史与社会学的工作规范研究。20世纪50-70年代,劳动关系系统论和牛津学派多元主义承继了这两种研究传统,并确定了现代劳动关系的基本理论分析框架。他们的研究呈现出两大明显特征,即结构主义和经验主义。20世纪80年代之后,随着欧美劳动关系研究的整体衰落,学界开始反思研究传统,马克思主义政治经济学、策略选择模型以及劳动关系平衡理论等在打破结构主义、反思经验主义方面有了较大突破。 |
英文摘要: | From the 1920s, industrial relations as a separate research field have developed following two kinds of traditions. The first is about the institution research from institutional economics, the second is in regard to the research of job regulations from history and sociology. From the 1950s to 1970s, industrial relations system and Oxford school pluralism inherited these traditions, and established the basic analytical framework of industrial relations theories. Structuralism and empiricism are distinguished features in these studies. From the 1980s, along with the decline of industrial relations in Europe and America, scholars began to rethink the research traditions. The political economy of industrial relations, the strategic choice model and the theory of balance of industrial relations, contributed to opposing structuralism and empiricism. |
作者: | 吴清军 |
作者单位: | 中国人民大学劳动人事学院 |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2015.3:196-221 |
中图分类号: | |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | 劳动关系 系统论 多元主义 制度主义 结构主义 经验主义 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | 本研究系中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目成果(14XNJ012),同时本项目获得北京市优秀人才培养资助。 |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第3968位读者! |