Democratic Planning for Freedom and Social Techniques: An interpretation of Mannheim's later sociology

曼海姆的以“为自由的民主计划”来重建社会为主题的晚期社会学很有理论价值和实践意义,但没有受到应有的重视,而且多有误解。曼海姆认为,社会计划本身是中性的,它和正确理解的自由、民主不但不冲突,反而内在契合；为自由的民主计划和重建社会的实现有赖于社会技术,其中教育和现代议会宪政推行的三权分立和制衡等社会技术非常重要。曼海姆的晚期社会学产生了广泛的影响,对当今转型期的中国很有理论借鉴意义。

Mannheim's later sociology, with the theme of social reconstruction based on democratic planning for freedom, has a great deal of theoretical value and practical significance. However, it has not been given due attention, and has received lots of misunderstandings. Mannheim argues that social planning itself is neutral, and it not only does not conflict with freedom and democracy, but also is internally and mutually compatible with freedom and democracy. The realization of democratic planning for freedom and social reconstruction depends on social techniques. Among them, education and the separation and counterbalance of the three powers of modern parliament constitutional government are particularly important. Mannheim's later sociology has produced extensive influences, and it has valuable theoretical implications for China's social transition.

欢迎阅读《社会学研究》！您是该文第2186位读者！