![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | The Evolution of Western Rural Restructuring Research |
摘要: | 英语学术界的乡村社会学与乡村研究并未消失或停滞。根据在Rural Sociology,Journal of Rural Studies,Sociologia Ruralis这三种英文期刊上发表的文献,乡村社会研究在最近30多年来大体经历了从现代主义到新乡村社会学、再到乡村研究文化转向的流变;除了各类具体论题外,围绕何谓乡村而形成的实体论与建构论,围绕什么是乡村转型而提出的生产主义与后生产主义的辩论,以及关于农村和农村研究的去农业化、去社区化的争议,都值得注意和玩味。 |
英文摘要: | Rural sociology in the English literature didn't disappear or stagnate in the past several decades. According to Rural Sociology, Journal of Rural Studies, and Sociologia Ruralis--the three major English journals in rural sociology, rural studies in the past 30 years have not evolved from Modernism to New Rural Sociology, and then to " The Cultural Turn". While there are many important discussions within the field of rural sociology, some of the most fundamental questions have not yet to be answered. For example, the debate between ontological and constructionist theories on the definition of "rural", the debate between productivist and post-productivist theories on the meaning of rural restructuring, and the research on de-agrarianization and de-communization are all worthwhile topics to explore and should be given further consideration in the future. |
作者: | 毛丹 王萍 |
作者单位: | 浙江大学地方政府与社会治理研究中心、浙江大学公共管理学院; 浙江工业大学政治与公共管理学院 |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2014.1:194-216 |
中图分类号: | C912 |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | 乡村社会学 转型 实体乡村 建构乡村 生产主义 后生产主义 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | 国家社会科学基金“乡村转型的动力机制与路径选择研究”(11CSH062);浙江省社会科学规划重点课题“村庄转型的动力机制与路径选择研究”(10CGSH02ZB) |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第3066位读者! |