![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu1.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu2.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu3.png)
![](/Areas/202005130001/Content/ZHYJY/img/niu4.png)
英文标题: | "Intrinsic Power-Responsibility Dilemma" in Social Mobilization: A case study of disaster governance at grassroots during Wenchuan earthquake relief |
摘要: | 本文研究灾难背景下权力与制度双向互动的逻辑及其所形成的资源配置架构。文章分析了全能取向下“家国同构”所内含的道德回应性与国家基础性权力的“强制性”面向如何引致动员的发生,以此来解决救灾响应不足的问题;展现了科层制和社会动员为克服国家权力的有限性所形成的嵌入型结构契合;提出“权威一责任一权力”的解释框架,来考察三者之张力如何对权力意志构成掣肘,从而产生“内生性权责困境”;最后,文章探讨了强制性、回应性、合法性与自主性四大要素是如何影响救灾过程中的权力结构的。 |
英文摘要: | This paper examines the interactions between power and institutions, as well as the structure of resources allocation during disastrous times. The authors analyze the moral responsiveness due to "family-state co-construction" under totalitarianism state, and the coerciveness of the infrastructural power, which resort to social mobilization to overcome the systematic inefficiency during disaster relief. The paper finds that the bureaucracy and social mobilization form an embedded structure to reduce the limitation of state power. The authors propose an interpretative framework, which integrates the three factors of authority, responsibility and power, trying to figure out how the tensions between the three impede the will to power, and thus generate a "intrinsic power-responsibility dilemma". Moreover, the authors explore how the four elements of coerciveness, responsiveness, legitimacy and autonomy, affect the power structure in disaster relief. |
作者: | 樊佩佩 曾盛红 |
作者单位: | 江苏省社会科学院社会发展研究中心;南京大学政府管理学院政治学系 |
期刊: | 社会学研究 |
年.期:页码 | 2014.1:125-147 |
中图分类号: | P315.9 |
文章编号: | |
关键词: | 基础性权力 国家权力 社会动员 回应性 权责困境 |
英文关键词: | |
项目基金: | |
欢迎阅读《社会学研究》!您是该文第3037位读者! |