为什么经济社会条件相近的城市数字化风险防控存在明显不同？对11座城市17个案例的比较发现，技术应用并非数字化转型实现的充要条件，“权力—利益—价值”机制才是数字化转型的成功密码。其中，权力机制强调主导性行动者权力和势能的提升，其权威性地位越高，数字化转型越能获得各方支持。利益机制关注对关联行动者的激励，行动者之间的收益兼容与风险分摊使数字化转型更为顺畅。价值机制则是依托共识与价值共创来实现数字平台的持续运转。以上发现有助于超越“技术—组织”互构的界面认知，打开数字化转型中组织间关系的理论“黑箱”。

Why do cities with similar socio-economic conditions exhibit significant differences in digital risk prevention and control? A comparative study of 17 cases in 11 cities reveals that technological application is not a sufficient and necessary condition for achieving digital transformation. Instead, the "Power-Interests-Values" mechanism is the key to unlocking digital transformation. The power mechanism emphasizes the enhancement of the dominant actors' influence, where the higher their authoritative position, the more support the transformation receives. The interest mechanism focuses on incentivizing related actors, facilitating the transformation through compatible benefits and risk-sharing. The value mechanism, grounded in consensus-building and co- creation of shared values, ensures the sustainable operation of digital platforms. These findings go beyond the conventional understanding of the "technology-organization" interface and help open the theoretical "black box” of inter-organizational dynamics in digital transformation.

本文为中央社会主义学院统一战线高端智库课题“超大城市社会治理研究”（ZK01202401033）的阶段性成果。

欢迎阅读《社会学研究》！您是该文第30位读者！