本文探讨了长时段工业发展情境下劳动争议治理的实践过程及其情法意涵，考察了地方政府调处劳动争议的差异化问题。研究发现，本地工业基础及其变迁深刻形塑了地方政府的情法认知，使其针对底线型争议和补偿型争议形成了不同取向的治理风格：底线型争议的治理遵循道义和科层的逻辑，倾向于实质化保障劳动者基础权益，体现情感道德保护和法律实用主义取向；补偿型争议的治理遵循以工业发展实际为核心的地方逻辑，倾向于保护当地企业经营，显示了区域情理对劳动法的调适作用。虽然地方政府以调解的方式实践“情法两平”，但仍需警惕其过度解读情理和让渡劳工权益的行为。

This paper explores the practical process and qing-fa process implications of labor dispute governance in the context of long-term industrial development, and examines the differentiated issues in local governments' mediation of labor disputes. The study finds that the local industrial foundation and its changes have profoundly shaped the qing-fa perceptions of local governments, leading them to adopt distinct governance styles in bottom-line disputes and compensation disputes: the former follows the logic of morality and bureaucracy, tending to substantively guarantee the basic rights of workers demonstrating an orientation of emotional-moral protection and legal pragmatism; the latter adheres to the local logic centered on the realities of industrial development, tending to protect the operation of local enterprises, revealing the adaptive role of regional qingli reason in labor law. Although local governments practice "Qingfa Liangping" through mediation, it is still necessary to be vigilant against overinterpreting qingli reason and ceding workers' rights.

欢迎阅读《社会学研究》！您是该文第338位读者！